Showing posts with label George Tiller. Show all posts
Showing posts with label George Tiller. Show all posts
Friday, January 29, 2010

37 Minutes


It took a jury in Kansas 37 minutes to convict the murderer of Dr. George Tiller of 1st degree murder, a crime which carries a life sentence.  Tiller, you may recall, was a doctor who performed late-term abortions.  He was murdered in church last summer.  The gunman also was convicted of assault with a deadly weapon for threatening two other people at the church.

The question of who shot Dr. Tiller was never in any doubt -- the shooter admitted it frequently to the news media and in court filings.  The purpose of the trial was not to determine whether the shooter had done the shooting, but rather whether it was a crime, and if so which one.  The gunman first proposed a "necessity defense," saying that he did what he did to protect unborn children.  The judge refused this argument on the grounds that, by law, fetuses do not enjoy legal protection and hence defending them is not a necessity.  The perpetrator then mounted the argument that he in good faith believed he was acting out of necessity, and that therefore this constituted manslaughter.  The judge eventually instructed the jury not to consider manslaughter but only 1st degree murder.  Deliberations were very, very brief.

I have been trying all week to figure out what this trial must have felt like to George Tiller's family.  Families of murder victims often talk about "getting justice for" their loved one, or "making sure the truth comes out."  The arrest means the bad guy is off the street, and the conviction is punishment not only for the murder but for trying to get out of taking responsibility for the murder.

This case, however, is different.  This shooter didn't try to lie his way out of the situation.  He didn't claim he hadn't done it.  The truth didn't need to come out -- it was already out.  The trial was a question of law, not of fact.  I suppose had the killer not been convicted it would have represented and absence of justice for Dr. Tiller, but the fact of the conviction hardly seems a great victory for the justice system.  Not if deliberations only took 37 minutes.  It was too easy.

I wonder if this doesn't create another set of issues for the Tiller family to process.  In some sense, the fact that the shooter was so proud and so open about what he did makes dealing with this death harder, not easier.  Convicting him and sending him to prison isn't a deterrent to those who think as he does -- they still believe what they are doing is right, just as he does.  It sends no significant "message" that the killer will ever really hear.  He will not and cannot be made to have remorse for what he did.  There is no satisfaction in saying, "See, you couldn't get away with it!" to someone who didn't even try to.

George Tiller is dead.  His wife has lost a husband and his children have lost a father.  The man who killed him and his supporters are dancing on Dr. Tiller's grave.  The fact that the shooter is doing so in prison doesn't make his loss any easier, or his behavior any less painful for the people this murder left behind.


Wednesday, July 29, 2009

Trauma Witness and Witness for the Prosecution

The preliminary hearing for the man accused of murdering Dr. George Tiller was held today. He was bound over for trial, to no one's surprise. The CNN coverage of the hearing quotes extensively from the testimony of two ushers who were at the Wichita, KS church where Tiller was also ushering when he was shot on May 31. Some language from their testimony stood out to me.

Gary Haup, who was standing with Tiller when he was shot, described what happened and then said that what he heard was a "pop."

Keith Martin, another usher, said that he heard a loud noise and saw Tiller on the floor. He said he recognized the man who shot him, but couldn't remember when. He also said that the man
had a horrible smell about him. ... It wasn't just somebody at the gym smell. It was something more, an ammonia-type smell.
He testified that the shooter threatened him as he chased him, and that he could see "straight down the barrel" of the man's gun.

These statements caught my eye because they are really vivid. Haup didn't hear "something" he heard a pop. The suspect didn't smell "bad" he had a very specific, unusual odor. And he didn't just see the gun, he "stared right down the barrel."

There are two things going on here. The first is that the prosecutor has almost certainly told these men to be as specific as possible with as much detail as they can remember. That's good prep work with witnesses.

The second thing that is going on here is that these witnesses are remembering vivid detail. That is what happens during traumatic events. When our bodies experience the "fight or flight" response with which we are all familiar, our brains flood with a neurotransmitter responsible for memory. All of our sensory exposure from that instant on is much more likely to be held in memory. We don't just remember what happened, we remember the sensory details. If you've ever been driving along and suddenly had to slam on the brakes because the car in front of you stopped short, you've seen this in action. You can't remember one thing from the second before it happened, but you can remember every little detail right afterward.

From an evolutionary standpoint, this makes sense. Natural selection favored those animals who could react quickly when faced with a threat -- that's how the fight or flight response evolved in the first place. But it also favored those animals who could identify a threat quickly. In order to do that, they had to learn from their experiences what was dangerous and what wasn't, and how best to react. And in order to do that, they had to keep track of everything they saw, smelled, tasted, felt or heard when something bad happened. That way, when it happened again, they could run even sooner.

The bad news for modern humans is that having heightened senses to perceive danger is not actually all that useful in today's society. Unless you are being shot at with some frequency, remembering what a shooter smells like, for example, is not actually going to help you survive. But it is going to set you up for some troublesome associations, without you necessarily knowing it. The next time Mr. Martin smells someone with that odd ammonia odor, his body is going to shift directly into danger mode, even though he will probably not be in danger.

If this has ever happened to you -- being thrown into overdrive by a smell or a sound that you subconsciously associate with a dangerous or stressful situation -- you probably know that it can make you feel completely insane. The good news, however, is that a) it's typical and b) it usually goes away in a few months. You will still have associations with that sensory experience, but they won't be so complete and alarming.

The good news is also that, if you have to, you'll be one heck of a detailed court witness.

(For additional Quarterbacking on Dr. Tiller's Murder, see The Tiller Family's Critical Incident)

Wednesday, June 10, 2009

The Tiller Family's Critical Incident

As you know, unless you've been living in a cave somewhere, Dr. George Tiller was murdered near the entrance of his church two Sundays ago. If that doesn't ring a bell, perhaps I should remind you that he was a doctor who performed late term abortions, and that the man accused of killing him is an anti-abortion activist.

So, here's what I'm not going to do. I am not going to discuss the pros and cons of abortion or wade into the politics or the moral equivalency or any of that. Others have done that much more eloquently than I, and I will leave it to them (for the best thing I've seen commenting on Dr. Tiller and his work, I invite you to read the sermon preached last Sunday at the Cathedral Church of Saint Paul in Boston by the Very Rev. Jep Streit, posted at http://www.poormojo.org/pmjadaily/archives/027002.php). What I am going to do is think about what George Tiller's family must be dealing with right now.

First off, what we have here is a traumatic death. It leaves grief, because a loved one has died, and trauma because it was sudden and scary. I don't know if he had family members in church that day or whether the news came by phone or a knock on the door, but at some moment his wife learned that she was now a widow, and most likely had the sensation that the world had come to a screeching halt.

As I discussed yesterday, one of the predictors of stress reaction is whether the person perceives that he or she is going to die. Certainly if Jeanne Tiller was in the church that would add to the trauma. What she saw and heard will directly impact her experience, because sensory exposure is also a predictor of stress reactions. But regardless of where she was or how she heard the news, what she experienced was much more than a loss, it was a trauma.

One might argue that it wasn't unexpected. After all, Dr. Tiller had been shot once before. He had bodyguards and security systems. He knew there were people who wanted him dead. But knowing it's coming can only inoculate people from the trauma a certain amount. It doesn't make it easy.

What makes this situation even more complicated, however, is the circumstances and motive surrounding it. Unlike most traumatic deaths, this one is actually causing people, sometimes in so many words, to publicly, openly and constantly discuss whether the victim "deserved" it. Now, most people aren't using that word, nor should they. But the constant discussion of the work that Dr. Tiller did and whether or not it was justified in some sense has that effect. Perhaps I could best illustrate this by way of a counter example: if (God forbid) I were to be murdered tomorrow, the news would mention that I am a school Principal. But it probably wouldn't spend a whole lot of time discussing whether my school is a good one. That complicates things.

Then we add on the fact that the alleged perpetrator is doing media interviews. In an interview with CNN yesterday, the accused gunman expressed joy that Dr. Tiller's clinic was going to close, and while he did not confess to the killing he made it clear that he was not sorry Tiller was dead. One of the things that relatives of traumatic death victims tell us is that they experience guilt that it wasn't them who died and anger that it wasn't somebody other than their loved one. In this instance, the interviews have to be compounding that sense of anger -- George Tiller is dead and his alleged Killer is basically dancing on his grave.

Whenever someone is murdered or dies by the act (either commission or omission) of someone else, the investigation and trial prolong the stress reaction. You can't really process a critical incident until it's over, and the investigation means it isn't over. How much worse must it be that this investigation is, in essence, of the victim as well as the crime, where the accused is answering the perennial question "why" with what to him is a justification, and that all this is happening in the national media.

I can only hope that the world lets the Tiller family process this trauma sooner rather than later. Only then can they move on to processing their grief.

Meet the Quarterback

My Photo
Naomi Zikmund-Fisher
is a clinical social worker, former school Principal and a Crisis Consultant for schools and community organizations. You can learn more about her at www.SchoolCrisisConsultant.com
View my complete profile

Subscribe via email

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Quarterback for Kindle